Most people reading this will be familiar with the Serenity Prayer.
God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change,
courage to change the things I can,
and wisdom to know the difference.
This sentiment is one that has served people for millennia and is key to helping people achieve “inner tranquility and outer effectiveness,” to quote the Stoic philosopher Epictetus.
And yet, this approach can be taken to the extreme. It can be an excuse for doing nothing, and for justifying the status quo, regardless of how unsatisfactory that status quo is. No doubt it was in the face of this mindset that Angela Davis very famously wrote: “I am no longer accepting the things I cannot change. I am changing the things I cannot accept.” After all, this is how progress is made. Acceptance is a reasonable approach to those things you cannot control, but as George Bernard Shaw pointed out, “all progress depends on the unreasonable man.”
How can these two approaches be reconciled, and should they? For me, the answer comes down to another ancient figure, this time the Buddha. Rather than relying solely on the false dichotomy that Epictetus and Angela Davis set out, the Buddha identified a third way. “There are three solutions to every problem: accept it, change it, or leave it. If you can’t accept it, change it. If you can’t change it, leave it.”
The Buddha’s approach gives us a sort of decision tree. For inner peace, we should start with trying to accept what is. However, there are times when what is will go against our moral fabric. We will simply be unable to accept it, as Angela Davis pointed out. In these instances, we must work to change it. And if we can’t change it? Well, then instead of spending our time and mental energy on something we do not control, we must learn to leave it alone.
This last transition, from working to change something to leaving it is a curious one. Is the Buddha saying that if we can’t immediately achieve the results we seek, we resign ourselves and move on? That’s not how I take it. I understand the Buddha as acknowledging that the work for change could be in a moment, or it could be the work of a lifetime or many lifetimes. It could be as simple as picking up the wet towel off the floor that your spouse left there (again), or as complex and difficult as addressing centuries of injustice.
The move from acceptance to change to leaving is not about a period of time, or the ease or difficulty of the work involved. Rather, it is about you making your own decision about which path you will choose. If you refuse to accept it, you must work to change it. If you refuse to do the work, or to continue the work until completion, you must choose to leave it alone. Otherwise, spending never ending mental cycles on something that you are not actively pursuing is a waste of your time and mind, both of which can and should be put to better use.
So, what does all of this mean in practice?
First, it is important to recognize that acceptance does not have to mean resignation or defeat. Acceptance can be a powerful tool for finding peace and contentment in the face of difficult circumstances. By accepting the things that we cannot change, we free ourselves from the burden of trying to control things that are outside of our power so that we can instead focus our limited energy on the things that we can control and make the most of our current situation.
Second, despite its benefits, acceptance is not always the best course of action. If we are facing a problem or challenge that goes against our values or morals, we may feel compelled to act no matter how large or daunting the challenge in front of us. In this case, working to change what is may be the right choice. It won’t always be easy. Depending on what we seek to change it could require significant effort and resources, and there is no guarantee of success. However, it can also be a deeply rewarding experience that allows us to make a positive impact in the world. By acting, we can feel empowered and fulfilled, knowing that we are doing our part to create meaningful change.
Third, it is important to recognize that the decision to accept what is or work to change what is does not have to be a permanent one. Sometimes, we may need to accept a situation in the short term to preserve our mental and emotional well-being, while also taking steps to change the situation in the long term. Other times, we may need to work to change a situation that we have previously accepted, as our circumstances or priorities shift.
Ultimately, the decision to accept what is or work to change what is is a personal one, and it is and should be a fluid one. It is something our best thinkers have pondered and struggled with for thousands of years.
As a result, we are now in the fortunate position that we get to draw upon their wisdom and experience to inform our own approach.