Humans have a deep-seated love for narrative. We have a desire for storytelling, whether it be over a campfire, in a book, or on the small or big screen. In fact, some argue that storytelling is fundamental to being human. The need for stories is so strong that we will create them to explain our actions and decisions, even when we have no idea why we did the things we did. This is so common it has its own name: confabulation.
Despite this well-observed human tendency to look back to create narrative explanations, for the longest time the scientific community believed in associative or reinforcement learning. This is where there is a trigger (like Pavlov ringing the bell) and then a reward (like giving the dog food). Dogs, humans, and other animals, it was believed, learned by looking forward: there
was the cause, and then there was the effect.
However, more recent research by Huijeong Jeong and Vijay Namboodiri of the University of California, San Francisco suggests that the learning occurs the other way around. The dopamine release we receive at the time of the effect is not making us look forward to the reward, but is rather a sort of bookmark, triggering us instead to look back to the explanation for why this reward occurred. It provokes us to identify, and then to create the story behind it.
This would explain why we can and do create narratives to explain what happened, even when we have no clue. It really is core to being human, or rather core to being a member of the animal kingdom more broadly. What is strange is that we seem to have known and understood this direction of travel for quite some time.
This backwards looking way of creating the stories that explain the results permeates all aspects of our lives. As Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman says of our political leanings: "Subjectively, it feels like you believe in something because you have the arguments for it. But it works the other way around. You believe in the conclusion, and then you create supporting arguments. That’s fundamental." Again, that "fundamental" word. We fundamentally work backwards from the answer to create the story that is our explanation and justification.
Even before Kahneman there was the psychologist Alfred Adler who said: "Meanings are not determined by situations. We determine ourselves by the meanings we ascribe to situations." We do not come to the meaning based on what came before, but rather we have the meaning, and then we work backwards to create the story to justify that meaning out of how we interpret what came before.
In this, even Adler was late to the game. Thousands of years before psychology was a discipline it was the Roman Emperor and Stoic Marcus Aurelius who wrote: "External things are not the problem. It's your assessment of them. Which you can erase right now." It is great to see that neuroscience research is finally catching up and providing the biological mechanism that explains what the Stoics and others have known for so long to be true.
The ability to shape our own narratives is a powerful tool. It allows us to take control of our lives and see things in a more positive light. We can use this to our benefit and allow ourselves greater agency. By understanding that we are the ones creating the stories that shape our lives, we can choose to make them more positive and empowering.
This is an amazing power. It this shows that we, and we alone, get to create the stories we tell to explain our lives. We get to decide if they are just happening to us, and we lack agency in shaping them, or if they are our lives to live and to be told and interpreted by us.
If we are creating the story one way or the other, why wouldn't we go ahead and make it an epic adventure?