In Stoicism, Taoism, Buddhism, and so many other “isms” there is this concept of non-attachment. The fact that this same concept cropped up and continues to crop up in so many different places and times leads me to believe it is more a universal truth than something any philosophy or religion can lay claim to with any individualized authority.
There are different reasons for the desirability of non-attachment, particularly when it comes to “results.” Perhaps the most obvious is that the result, unlike the process and work we put into it on the front end, is not something we can control. Attaching our happiness or self-worth to this result would then be a recipe for disappointment as things will not always, or perhaps even in most cases turn out as we want.
However, I think another just as powerful justification for this non-attachment is that when it is all said and done, there is only a single result, and it is the same for all of us.
All of us default to chasing advancement in our careers, more money, medals and trophies, accolades, and the respect of others. It is in our human nature to do so. It is this constant striving that helped humans develop the wheel, harness electricity, sent humans into space, and developed vaccines that continue to save millions of lives.
It is also this striving that has pushed nearly 40% of Americans to now have symptoms of depression and anxiety.
This striving may be good for humanity, but is it good for the humans living and pursuing it? Perhaps most relevantly, is it good for you?
This is where I find another Stoic concept to be helpful, though again, one over which it does not necessarily hold a monopoly. The concept I am referring to is that of Memento mori, or “remember that you have to die.”
Perhaps this seems unnecessarily morbid for a blog post, but I would disagree. “Morbid” is defined as “an abnormal or unhealthy interest in…death and disease.” What if this contemplation of our own mortality is healthier for us than pretending it does not exist? Maybe that would still be “abnormal” since so many of us choose to live our lives without ever pondering what is coming for all of us, but that still does not, in my mind, make it the right or the better answer.
Rather than being “morbid” to contemplate our mortality, and that finish line to which we are all constantly racing, Memento mori can be a liberating concept. Knowing the destination from the beginning, it frees us to not get attached to those mercurial “destinations” we would otherwise chase. As with climbing a mountain, every summit or milestone we reach inevitably opens new vistas still beyond our reach, an even better job, even more money, even greater “success.”
If our happiness or self-worth are tied to the destination, this is discouraging. If we instead are not attached to the summit as a destination, since there is only one destination that matters anyway, but rather focused on the process of climbing, of working, and of pursuing, then the new vistas become exciting new opportunities to continue the process, and the journey.
So, yes, the destination is the same for all of us. However, everything between our entering this world and that end? That is the process that matters. We all have an entirely individualized opportunity and responsibility to make what happens before that end point our own.
Given that, we might as well make that process known as living a masterpiece.