Increasing our “quality of life” sounds like an admirable objective. Who could argue against wanting greater quality in our lives? However, like so much else, many of us, myself included, have taken a theoretically good concept, and distorted it in unhelpful and unhealthy ways.
This is particularly ironic when it comes to quality of life. Merriam-Webster defines quality of life as “overall enjoyment of life: general well-being” and “specifically : the degree to which a person or group is healthy, comfortable, and able to enjoy the activities of daily living.” This at least sounds right and good!
Perhaps it is just me, though, but for much of my life I added and disproportionately weighted an economic component to this.
Maybe I was taking signals from my surroundings on this. The Economist Intelligence Unit (the research and analysis unit of the Economist Group) publishes a “Where-to-be-born index” that was itself previously called the “Quality-of-life index.” In describing the methodology for the index, Wikipedia lists the very first independent variable included as “Material well-being as measured by GDP per capita (in $, at 2006 constant PPPS).” NOTE: PPPS relates to “purchasing power parity” in that $1 in Bolivia buys far more than $1 in Switzerland.
Notice that Merriam-Webster mentions nothing at all about material well-being. There is an assumption being made that one thing, in this case per capita GDP, is more likely to lead to another thing, i.e., a healthy, comfortable life where you can enjoy the activities of daily living.
Maybe this is true in many cases, but that does not mean that one thing equals the other. Someone who toils through inhumane hours to build financial wealth and dies at his desk demonstrates that optimizing on this one variable that was never more than a proxy for the others can come at the direct cost of those you were trying to optimize for in the first place. This person through his work increased that per capita GDP, but he also was not healthy because he did not eat or sleep well, he did not get enough exercise, or enough social and family time necessary for a healthy mental life. He almost definitionally did not get to enjoy the daily activities of living.
Quality of life having a material component can informative or helpful in some cases, and in others (Many? Most?) it can also hurt.
Maybe this is why I am so careful in answering the question people inevitably ask when they find out I moved to Bermuda. “Do you love it?”
The short answer, of course, is yes! The more nuanced answer I feel necessary to share with them comes down to reassessing “quality of life.”
“When it comes to our material quality of life,” I always point out, “it is much lower here than back in Atlanta.” I explain how I drive a 2006 car with nearly 200,000 kms on it. How we rent a place smaller than what we had in Atlanta, and without all the same modern amenities. About how now that we are on an island, I can’t just push a button and have whatever I think I want at any given moment delivered to me in a matter of hours.
By some measures, by my own previous measures, all of this would be a step back in my “quality of life.” By the previously-known-as the Quality-of-life index this would also be a step back given that Bermuda is so expensive that when it comes to purchasing power parity, each dollar here buys me roughly half of what I would get for the same dollar in Atlanta.
I then go on to say that when it comes to the non-material measures of my quality of life, however, the move has been a dramatic step up. On this tiny island I get time in the ocean every day. Literally. I get to explore with my daughter in ways I couldn’t, or at least didn’t, when we lived in a more urban environment. Not being able to click a button and buy new things, I have reduced my consumption and become more thoughtful about what I need, not just what I want. I have been able to reassess my priorities, and to reprioritize how and where I spend my life as a result.
The step back in “material well-being” has been a giant leap forward for the quality of my life.
I realize not everyone can hop on a plane or boat and move to an island, and I don’t think it necessary or advisable for everyone to do so. Everyone can and should, however, think about how they measure their own quality of life.
Are you pursuing real quality, or a proxy for quality? Is that proxy still serving you, or has it over time become so distorted in your pursuit that it is now coming at the cost of the quality you are seeking?
That is a quality question that is always worth asking and answering.